Except perhaps when you're defining the precise terminology; then you can also use " formal argument/parameter" and " actual argument/parameter" to disambiguate. 2. tolerance. His mother-in-laws decision is final she will not sell her house this year. a. M True "No dogs are purple" Biesta (2007) lays out a careful yet devastating argument against basing all educational policy on what we call "evidencebased research," meaning not only empirical research, but experimental-based research following the model of randomized controlled field trials of research-based medicine. b. The literature review is followed by a statement of the precise focus of the research, and this statement builds on the knowledge gap in the problem statement. Chain argument c. Hasty generalization The National Science Board (2000) cautioned that believers in paranormal phenomena are dangerously distanced from reality: "Their beliefs may indicate an absence of critical thinking skills necessary not only for informed decision making in the voting booth and other civic venues (for example, jury duty), but also for making wise choices needed for everyday living" (p. 12). Which of the following best describes an argument that commits the informal fallacy of equivocation? Making an assumption that something is true simply because most people believe it to be true is an example of the _____ form of the popular appeal fallacy. A snake is a mammal. Archived from the original on 2012-12-05. c. A chain argument 1.happiness 4.The conclusion of a deductively valid argument necessarily follows from its premises. c. Deny the antecedent Nonmoral values, on the other hand, are goal oriented. 2.None of these answers is correct. 3. confidence. "No animals are unicorns" A claim that has feelings in it. Which of the following displays the informal fallacy of appeal to pity? c. The conclusion of a valid deductive argument necessarily follows from its premises Argument based on mathematics a. 1.A correlation always indicates a causal relationship. Unfortunately, he got D on the test. -Sometimes contains words or phrases such as: certainly, definitely, absolutely, conclusively, must be, & it necessarily follow that, A deductive argument presented in the form of two supporting premises and a conclusion, A deductive argument where the form is such that the conclusion must be true if the premises are assumed to be true, The pattern of reasoning in a deductive argument, A deductive argument that is valid and that has true premises, A deductive argument that rules out different possibilities until only one remains, A deductive argument in which the conclusion depends on a mathematical or geometrical calculations, A deductive argument in which the conclusion is true because it is based on a key term or essential attribute in a definition, A deductive argument that contains two premises, at least one of which is a conditional statement --> "ifthen" statement, Mondus ponens arguments (Fallacy of Affirming the Consequent), There is one conditional premise, a second premise that states that the antecedent, or IF part, of the first premise is true, and a conclusion that asserts the truth of the consequent, or the THEN part, of the first premise, Mondus tollens (Fallacy of Denying the Antecedent), A hypothetical syllogism in the which the antecedent premise is denied by the consequent premise, A type of imperfect hypothetical argument made up of 3 conditional propositions -2 premises and 1 conclusion - linked together, A deductive argument w/h 2 premises and 3 terms, each of which occurs exactly twice in two of the three propositions, In a categorical syllogism, the term that appears second in the conclusion, In a categorical syllogism, the term that appears once in each of the premises, The predicate (P) term in a categorical syllogism, The premise in categorical syllogism that contains the predicate term, The subject (S) term in a categorical syllogism, The premise in a categorical syllogism that contains the subject term, Whether a categorical proposition in universal or particular, A term, such as ALL, NO, or NOT, which indicates whether a proposition is affirmative or negative, A visual representation of a categorical syllogism used to determine the validity of the syllogism, A type of deductive argument by elimination in which the premises present has only 2 alternatives. 2.careful reflection 1.tone of voice All fruit are apples Sound c. Validity This is the first citation of the source in the paper. b. 2.Generalizations never provide evidence for their conclusions. 2- identify the authors claim 4.good critical thinking skills. a. a. c. Universal negative Particular affirmative 2. spatial-temporal reasoning Critical rationalists maintain which of the following? answer choices . Killing or euthanizing a human person is morally wrong. "All S are V. Some V are not I. 2.There are objects that must be studied. 1.a moral theory that claims that different cultures have different moral beliefs 2.a compassionate heart 4.Individuals tend to reason well regardless of context. Invalid *The term that appears 2nd in the conclusion, "Some M are not N. All P are N. Therefore, some P are not M." What is the middle in this argument? 2.an argument that God must exist since the universe would not exist without a first cause The premises Which of the following describes an inference? a. follow connections between a claim that was made and the evidence used to support it 1.a moral theory Which of the following true of correlations? 4.If the conclusion of an inductive argument is true, then the premises must be true as well. 3.Religious beliefs should never be held, because there is no possible evidence that can support the existence of God. Translate the claim into standard form The first premise Any argument with false premises is fallacious. b. N In a fallacious argument, the conclusion does not follow from the premises, regardless of whether the premises happen to be true. Which of the following best describes when an argument is inductively forceful or strong? "A fetus is a type of human person. The student is quoting from page 26 of an article by Peter Greasley published in 2000. The student is quoting from paragraph 1 of a 1998 online article by Travis Dacolias. False, What resources did the participants in the Milgram and Stanford University prison experiments who resisted hurting their subjects have that the other participants probably did not? All people required to take the exam are Freshman, Which fallacy occurs when particular proposition is misinterpreted as a universal generalization? Not all times it rains are times it pours Indicate whether the statements below are TRUE or FALSE according to the passage. "All men are moral. To date, restorers have completed about a score of houses and other buildings in Nauvoo. b. Modus ponens Which of the following is a strategy that falls under the heading of reason? Cross out any misspelled word, and write the correctly spelled word above it. d. The same term for both, Which of the following is true of deductive arguments? Otherwise, criminals wouldn't receive just punishment for abhorrent crimes." Which of the following is NOT a rhetorical device? A Then, add the necessary end mark for given sentence. A. Sarcastic B. When science and religion conflict, we should side with science. 1.the process of clarifying what you mean when you make a claim 2.wealth a. c. No people required to take the exam are Seniors, a. SURVEY . In "The Plea for Eight Hours" (1890), Powderly makes an argument in favour of the eight-hour workday. 4- *Reading for 20 minutes every day exposes students to nearly 1.8 million words each school year* and *Children who read 5 or less minutes a day are more likely to score lower on reading tests* 4.All of these are strategies that fall under the heading of reason. c. A poll (1 point) A. an analysis based on an emotional response to a text B, an idea or conclusion based on text evidence and reasoning C. an idea that is explicitly stated in a text D. an argument based on details not found in a text A student asks a teacher to give him an A in a course because if he gets anything less, he will not get into medical school. It is based on evidence from different sources. It is thought out and convincing. a. A deductive argument with 2 premises, at least 1 of which is a hypothetical claim, "If you went to the store last night, then we have milk. a. 1.It is simple. a well-written argument a persuasive argument an argument that provides just some reason for believing its conclusion an argument that guarantees the truth of its conclusion if its premises are all true. to offer a new way of looking at a particular state of affairs. Which of the following fallacies is a fallacy of ambiguity? 4.an argument that contains a prescriptive premise, an argument that contains a prescriptive premise, Which of the following is true of conscience? A correlation is when two events occur together at a rate higher than mere chance would predict. 3.styles of communicating b. 2.critical thinking skills I would also be happy checking answers. 2.Passive-aggressive communicators avoid confrontation and instead let others control them. I got 4/4 with these so you should too. Therefore, he didn't study." If the sentence has no spelling errors, write C after the sentence. Therefore, some S are not I." 1.an argument that at first appears to be correct but is not "dream journal". Choosing appropriate evidence to support your argument will depend mostly on your personal interests and preferences. The correct answer is B. 1.the preconventional stage 1.the conclusion of an argument c. Categorical 4. the repetition of sounds at the beginning of words, 1- follow connections between a claim that was made and the evidence used to support it Argus Panoptes ( ), guardian of the heifer-nymph Io and son of Arestor(According to Asclepiades Argus panoptes was a son of Inachus, and according to Cercops he was a son of Argus and Ismene, daughter of Asopus;Acusilaus says that he was earth-born(authochthon, born from Gaia). (Multiple Choice) Question 1 . The use of reason and evidence to support a conclusion Which of the following statements is true of issues? In a modus _______________ argument, the second premise denies the consequent, Which type of syllogism contains a conditional premise and a premise that states the antecedent? An argument that some claim must be false because no one can prove that it is true. The food company's products are fine in moderation - it . b. She used imagination and spatial-temporal reasoning. d. A deductive argument with a conclusion that is a hypothetical claim, b. a. b. Kara is coming over, and she is allergic to fish. c. "All" in front of either of the terms a. a. the argument is sound Which of the following best describes an argument in the context of critical thinking? d. Modus tollens, Which go the following describes whether the claim applies to all members of the group or a certain subset? Which of the following is the most common form of the fallacy of popular appeal? 3.The purpose of argumentation is to convince others of the truth of what you believe. Bruh Champ is 100% correct. What type of argument is this? Hypothetical syllogism 1) An emotional appeal based on ethics and credibility 2) A sentimental appeal based on emotions and interests 3) An anecdotal appeal based on evidence and ethics 4) A logical appeal based on facts and reason 2 See answers Advertisement Greenleafable All rains are pours 19. Who among the following is a political scientist who maintains that public disbelief in a man-made cause of global warming in the face overwhelming scientific evidence is caused by the inability of scientists to clearly explain that evidence? 3.Reliable polls must use a sample that is representative of the entire population. a. False, Claiming that a member of a group must have some characteristic of that group is which informal fallacy? c. PM b. 4.None of these answers is correct. Since Sara couldn't be admitted, Veronica reasoned that Sara was innocent." When you evaluate an argument, you carefully consider the logic and organization the author use to make their case. b. Upon what type of argument is the reasoning based? "If there are ants in the sugar bowl, they will probably be in the honey pot as well. Kurtz (2000) argued that mediums claiming to communicate with the dead were aided at the end of the twentieth century by mass media exposure and a credulous American public (pp. c. It has no premises 3. Jay knows all about Severus Snape. "If Jamal studies for the exam, he'll do well. 2.the ability to ignore the influence of emotions when reasoning 3.the ability to accurately perceive, appraise, and express emotions 4.the ability to use the fear and self-interest of others to make them believe what you would like them to believe 4.deductive argument, Which of the following best describes a causal argument? "Not" in front of either of the terms 4.When science and religion conflict, we should side with religion. Choose three pilgrims and describe how their outward appearances reflect their personalities. Which of the following is used to interpret the communications of others? b. The information collected in the Freshman Survey is used to make which of the following types of argument? 2.Arthur Lupia 3.an argument that concludes one thing is the cause of other things a. Operationalizing concepts involves making concepts measurable. 1.an argument that uses the word "because" 3.two people angrily disagreeing with one another over an important issue b. 4.None of these answers is correct. 2.to make careful and objective observations Which or the following best describes a problem associated with the concept of race? a. 1.two people angrily disagreeing with one another over an important issue An argument is valid, and its premises are true. b. Operationalizing is the same as making concepts valid. 3.Language can be used by those in power to stimulate free and open discussion among the citizens of a country. Which of the following sentences would be the best thesis statement for an essay? b. 1.If the premises of an inductive argument are all true, then the conclusion might still be false. 2.attempting to provide rational support for a claim with a set of premises 3.All these answers are correct. false, Which of the following best describes ethical subjectivism? CONCEPT. True Which of the following is a word or phrase that typically indicates an analogy? False. 1.a moral theory that claims that moral truth is relative to a cultural background What is an argument? c. Affirming the consequent a) An argument that guarantees the truth of its conditions b) An argument that claims that something is the cause of something else c)An argument that claims a group is likely to have some characteristic on the grounds that a subset of that group has that characteristic d) None of the answers are correct 1.the moral theory that claims you should do what is most useful for you